- Introduction to generic and branded antiepileptic drugs
- Epilepsy and its treatment
- Generic antiepileptic drugs
- History of generic substitution and epilepsy: the evidence
- Prescribability versus switchability
- Potential problems of switching antiepileptic drugs
- Medication education and prescription
- Practice guidelines for antiepileptic drug prescription
- High risk groups
- Cost benefits versus the cost of switching
- Antiepileptic drugs: the unknown
For a number of years, there has been concern in the healthcare industry about the use of generic epileptic medication. A generic drug is a copy of the original product manufactured to treat a disease. The generic copy is made of exactly the same active ingredient as the original but may have slightly different inactive ingredients and manufacturing processes. For most medications, generics present a safe and cheap alternative to the original medicine. However, for some medications, including antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), there is concern about the safety of substituting a generic brand.
It is very important for all people with epilepsy and their families to understand the nature of AEDs, and the precautions that need to be taken if switching medications is necessary.
|For more information on generic drugs and substitution policies, see Generic and Branded Medication: Similarities and Differences.|
Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are used to treat epilepsy. AEDs inhibit seizures by reducing neuronal excitability. Members of this class of drugs include carbamazepine, phenytoin, valproate, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, gabapentin, levetiracetam, pregabalin, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, acetazolamide and sulthiame.
AEDs are a very unique and complicated group of neuropharmaceuticals. Some characteristics of AEDs are:
- Narrow therapeutic windows: The therapeutic window of a drug is the range of dosages that can effectively treat a condition while still remaining safe. That is, the range between the lowest dose that has a positive effect and the highest dose before the side effects outweigh the benefits of the drug.
- Critical dose medicines: A critical dose is the optimum safe and effective dose of the drug for an individual. This dose is determined by titration, which is performed by your doctor. If the effects of a medication are not strong enough after the initial dose, the dose will be increased; if a dose causes too many side effects, it will be decreased. This continues until the critical dose is achieved. Once the critical dose has been determined, you must strictly adhere to your medication schedule to maintain control of the condition. Although uncommon, some people will require a dose of the AED that is very close to the therapeutic limit of the drug. For these people, a very slight increase in drug absorption could produce toxicity.
- Biopharmaceutical properties: Certain AEDs have very unusual biopharmaceutical properties. For example, phenytoin is not metabolised by the liver in the same way as other AEDs. For most patients this is not a cause for concern, but in patients that have reduced liver functioning, such as the elderly, it can cause side effects.
- Pregnancy and mental impairment: Currently, doses of AEDs are kept as low as possible in females of childbearing age to reduce the risk of defects in a developing baby during pregnancy. The dose is also kept low in people who are intellectually impaired to avoid any further mental impairment.
|For more information on epilepsy and its treatments, and some useful animations and videos, see Epilepsy.|
Before a generic drug can be marketed, it must undergo a process of bioequivalence testing to make sure it has the same biological effects as the original branded drug. In bioequivalence testing, the bioavailability of the two drugs are compared to each other; the drugs are said to be bioequivalent if the tests show that they are statistically less than 20% different.
In most cases, this is only a very subtle change and the two drugs can be switched without any side effects. In AEDs, however, a 20% difference between the absorption, distribution, metabolisation or elimination of the drugs has the potential to cause side effects. This can be explained by referring back to the unusual properties of AEDs – they have a narrow therapeutic window and a critical dose. If the generic version of the drug has 20% greater absorption than the original drug, it has the potential to produce a toxic effect. If the generic has 20% less absorption, it has the potential to affect seizure control and the patient may experience breakthrough seizures.
This theory is not yet proven, but a number of observations and studies have suggested that there is a real risk involved, and it is therefore an area of concern.
In Australia during the 1960s, the formulation for the AED Dilantin (phenytoin) was altered slightly, although the active ingredient remained the same (much the same as a generic version of a drug is altered). Following this formulation change, there was an outbreak in phenytoin toxicity among people with epilepsy. Toxicity was caused by an increased systemic absorption of the drug as a result of the slight changes in formulation. This finding sparked the first concerns about AED formulation changes. Dilante (phenytoin) has since been changed back to the original form.
In 1988, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) investigated a number of seizure breakthroughs in patients receiving a generic form of carbamazepine. The drug has since been withdrawn from the market.
In 1996, a large study assessed the proportion of epileptic patients that had negative experiences with generic AEDs. Out of the 1,288 patients involved in the study, 251 had made a medication switch. The switches included from a branded to generic drug; a generic to branded drug; and a generic to another generic drug. Of these 251, 10.8% reported problems that were validated by a doctor; 9.9% had unproven problems; and 8.8% reported problems but did not complete the study, so it was unknown whether these problems were validated. The authors concluded that there were significant risks associated with AED brand substitution.
Another study yielded conflicting results. The researchers compared Depakene (valproic acid) to a generic form of valporic acid. No significant differences in seizures or blood levels were found.
Unfortunately, so far the evidence is limited. Previous retrospective studies with surveys of patients’ and doctors’ opinions and reported problems are not adequate for establishing the risk of switching AEDs. Further research into the area is needed.
The generic and branded forms of AEDs are deemed bioequivalent by the regulatory bodies, so why are we seeing these negative effects with the generic drugs?
Contrary to general belief, it is not the prescribing of generic AEDs that appears to be the problem; it is switching between two brands. Most of the time, the switch will be from the more expensive brands to the newer generic forms, hence problems arising from the switch may be falsely attributed to the generic drug.
Once a critical effective dose to control the epilepsy is achieved with one drug, swapping to a drug with a slightly different formulation can change the critical dose needed, and control of seizures may be lost.
There are several potential problems involved with switching between forms of AEDs:
- Breakthrough seizures are seizures that occur in people who have their epilepsy well controlled and have had a number of seizure-free years. Breakthrough seizures can be devastating for people with epilepsy, both physiologically and psychologically. Loss of confidence and anxiety can result, as can loss of faith in medication, driving and caring for children;
- Seizures while driving, resulting in loss of license;
- Toxicity and the associated side effects;
- Increased number of doctor visits; and
- Decreased work time.
All of the above potential problems present their own set of issues, among them financial, that can amount to more than the cost benefits associated with generic medication.
As with all medication switches, there is also a risk of becoming confused due to the physical differences between the new drug and the familiar one. This may cause one of two fatal consequences:
- A person with epilepsy may become anxious and not take the medication, risking loss of seizure control; or
- A person with epilepsy could mix the use of the old and new medication, risking toxicity and the related side effects.
Do not underestimate the importance of making sure you are educated in the medication you are taking. A study assessing the attitudes of people with epilepsy to their medication found that while 74% pay very close attention to their medication and would notice and query if it is different from the usual prescription, 19% would notice but never query the pharmacist or doctor about the change, and an alarming 6.5% do not pay close enough attention to the drugs to be able to notice if they are given something different. That is, approximately 26% of people with epilepsy admitted to not speaking up about, or not even noticing, changes in their medications.
Always ask your doctor or pharmacist if you are concerned or confused about the medication you have received. All people with epilepsy should learn the brand name they are originally prescribed from a very early age. If you ever visit a different pharmacist or doctor, they may substitute your brand of medication without realising, so it is very important that you know what AED you are usually prescribed.
If you have been newly diagnosed with epilepsy, it is not uncommon or unreasonable for your neurologist to prescribe a generic medication after discussing it with you. As you have not had any AEDs, before you will not be switching from a brand to a generic drug. When starting treatment, blood tests will need to be taken before and after the initial dose to make sure the drug is present at safe levels in your system. Your doctor will then titrate the dose in order to find the range that works best for you.
When prescribing initially, your doctor will take into consideration:
- Your individual needs and type of epilepsy. Some AEDs work better for certain classes of the condition;
- For children, which AED forms come in syrup and can be changed easily to tablets later on; and
- How likely it will be that the medication will be on the market reliably and consistently so you will not have to change.
If you are currently taking a generic or branded medication and your epilepsy is not under control, it is reasonable for your neurologist to suggest that you switch AEDs, either to a generic or branded form. The same considerations as for an initial prescription are valid. Also, there will be an appropriate crossover period for the drugs, when the dose of the old will decrease and the dose of the new will increase until the new drug takes over and the titration period begins.
Make sure that you are aware of the potential risks of switching medications and that you are prepared for regular check ups with your doctor to allow your progress to be monitored.
If you have had your epilepsy under control for some time, generic substitution is best avoided.
Certain groups of people with epilepsy are more susceptible to complications associated with switching AEDs than others, including people who:
- Are likely to become confused or are unable to manage their medication schedule (e.g. elderly, children, patients with a cognitive disability);;
- Have coexisting conditions that may interfere with the pharmacokinetics of the AED, especially those with liver or kidney disease;
- Take other medication and may be susceptible to drug–drug interactions that will affect the pharmacokinetics of the AED (e.g. women taking the contraceptive pill); and
- Heavily drink and smoke.
It is best to avoid switching if you are in one of these groups. If a switch is necessary, be aware that you will need to regularly visit your doctor for monitoring.
The benefit of generic medication is purely economic. In the case of AEDs, the cost benefits of generic substitution are contentious. With any switch in AEDs, whether it is brand to generic, generic to brand or generic to generic, practice guidelines recommend that plasma levels be monitored before and after the switch. With this comes the associated doctor and pathology costs.
As the use of generic AEDs is a widespread and well known area of concern, there are a number of psychological stressors associated, from both doctors and patients. This may encourage people on generic AEDs to increase the number of consultations, or the doctor to feel that a greater number of medication review consultations are required.
The potential costs of switching to a generic form must also be considered. Although rarely occuring and the link unproven, breakthrough seizures, car accidents, loss of licence and loss of work time may cause far greater financial concerns than the extra money needed for the more expensive branded drug.
The therapeutic profiles of AEDs are still not fully understood. Epilepsy foundations around the world are asking the same questions:
- What is the scope of the problem?
- What is the entire range of side effects and are there any adverse effects associated with switching between AEDs?
- Is there any way to pinpoint at-risk individuals? The Crawford study reported that 70% of patients who changed medications had no problems, so what is the difference between these people and those who experienced adverse effects?
Without further research, it is simply impossible to determine the actual risk associated with generic AEDs or the switch from one form of an AED to another. Until a greater understanding is reached, it is wise to err on the side of caution – generic substitution should be avoided once seizures are under control. If switching between medications is required, it must be on the advice of and with strict monitoring by the prescribing doctor.
- NPS Media Release: Critical dose medicines and brand substitution: issues with anti-epileptic drugs [online]. National Prescribing Service. 6 February 2009 [cited 7 April 2009]. Available from URL: http://www.nps.org.au/ news_and_media_home/ media_releases/ repository/ Critical_dose_medicines_and_brand_substitution
- ESA Position Statement: Generic drug use in epilepsy [online]. Epilepsy Society of Australia. 3 October 2008 [cited 7 April 2009]. Available from URL: http://www.epilepsy-society.org.au/ pages/ generic_AEDs.php
- Treatment for epilepsy: Generic medications and substitution [online]. Epilepsy Australia [cited 7 April 2009]. Available from URL: http://www.epilepsyaustralia.net/ Epilepsy_Information/ Treatment_options/ Treatment_options.aspx#Generic
- Rang HP, Dale MM, Ritter JM, Moore PK. Pharmacology [5th edition]. London: Elsevier Science; 2003.
- Anticonvulsants [online]. Australian Medicines Handbook. January 2007 [cited 9 September 2007]. Available from URL: http://www.amh.net.au
- Drugs used in epilepsy [online]. Therapeutic Guidelines: Neurology. Version 2, 2003. [cited 9 September 2007]. Available from URL: http://www.tg.com.au.
- Krämer G, Biraben A, Carreno M, Guekht A, de Haan GJ, Jedrzejczak J, et al. Current approaches to the use of generic antiepileptic drugs. Epilepsy Behav. 2007; 11(1): 46-52.
- Gidal BE, Tomson Y. Debate: Substitution of generic drugs in epilepsy: Is there cause for concern? Epilepsia. 2008; 49(Suppl 9): 56-62.
- NPS News 55: Generic medicines: Dealing with multiple brands [online]. 1 December 2007 [cited 3 April 2009]. Available from URL: http://www.nps.org.au/ health_professionals/ publications/ nps_news/ current/ nps_news_55/ generic_medicines_dealing_with_multiple_brands
- Vajda FJE. Generic substitution in epilepsy: A controversial issue. The Epilepsy Report [online]. Epilepsy Australia. October 2006 [cited 3 April 2009]. Available from URL: http://www.epilepsyaustralia.net/ Publications/ Archives/ vajda_generics.pdf
- Topiramate [online]. Pharmaceutical Benefits Schedule. 1 April 2009 [cited 25 April 2009]. Available from URL: http://www.pbs.gov.au
- Crawford P, Hall WW, Chappell B, Collings J, Stewart A. Generic prescribing for epilepsy. Is it safe? Seizure. 1996; 5(1): 1-5.
- National Prescribing Service. Know the active ingredient [online]. 15 October 2008.[cited 3 April 2009]. Available from URL: http://www.chf.org.au/ Docs/ Downloads/ fac-know-the-active-ingredient.pdf
- Probyn AJ. Some drugs are more similar than others: Pseudo-generics and commercial practice. Aus Health Rev. 2004; 28(2): 207-17.
- An interview with Steven C. Schachter, M.D. [online]. Epilepsy Foundation. 2006 [cited 3 April 2009]. Available from URL: http://www.epilepsyfoundation.org/ generics/ schachterinterview.html